
Inside Man may be a paint by the numbers thriller directed by one of the heavyweights of contemporary film, but that doesn’t mean it isn’t a paint by the numbers thriller. You’ve got your plot twists, the hard ass cops and robbers, the MacGuffin, all of those things, and they make for an entertaining viewing experience, though certainly not a memorable one. Alfred Hitchcock was the only great filmmaker that could consistently elevate the thriller material to high art. Director Spike Lee never comes close.
The film covers a couple of days in the lives of various New Yorkers that are caught up or involved in a Wall Street bank robbery. Dalton Russell (Clive Owen), the leader of the heist, has planned this caper perfectly. He takes hostages, dresses them in the same painter suits that his gang wears, and devises a number of ways to subtly screw with the cops waiting outside, such as by looping a taped speech in a foreign language. Detective Keith Frazier (Denzel Washington) heads the police detail, negotiating with the criminals inside, his suspicions constantly growing. Russell, clearly a smart and cunning criminal, makes demands that seemingly are designed to be impossible to meet. Certainly this guy knows he’ll never be awarded a jet to cart off 50 hostages, so why bother asking?
The problem, the same as most thrillers, is that we simply can’t believe most of what is going on. Frazier acts like an obnoxious jerk to everyone other than his girlfriend, which never strikes me as a good way to talk to a hostage taker (apparently a D- is an acceptable score in the hostage negotiation course). Similar to last year’s failed Bruce Willis vehicle Hostage, people casually stroll in and out of the crime scene as if it were a grocery store. I believe that police can seriously botch the security of a site, but the only criticism the cops receive are that they use too many racial slurs.
At one point, the shady owner of the bank (Christopher Plummer, looking 20 years too young for the part) hires Madeline White (Jodie Foster, taking too many of these parts lately) to go to the bank and ensure that the contents of a certain safety deposit box are undisturbed. What exactly does White do? Beats me, because Lee gambles that if someone charges a lot, talks professionally, and acts like they’re supposed to be there, then the audience can accept a civilian being granted access to saunter inside the bank and launch her own personal negotiations. He should have bet on red.
Oh well. This sort of formula film should come with a Mad Libs version of a review for itself, where the variance comes in the form of adjectives like "Good" or "Bad". But it does entertain, better than many, and contains a few bright spots. The performances are good, and a scene where Russell examines the morbid portable video game of one of the hostages plays nicely, as does a mini-commentary about a Sikh being mistaken for a Muslim. There are flourishes of intelligence and sincerely interesting filmmaking, but they are so brief I wouldn’t be surprised to find out they were spliced in from other projects. After years of dismal failures at the box office, Inside Man provided Lee with the type of hit that would convince studios to keep giving him money, but I doubt that he would ever include it on a list of his favorites.
2.5 out of 5
